Here are some excerpts concerning what Abul-'Abbaas Moosa Richardson (hafidhahullaah) said concerning the statement my recitation of the Qur`an that Ahlul-Bid'ah dubiously use seeking fitnah for the people:
"I need to clarify this to make it entirely clear. First of all, the issue of talking about my recitation of the Qur`an, my Qira`a or Lafdh and, is it created or not, in requiring one answer, this is from the speech of Ahlul-Bid'ah in the first place. It's from their ways to try to confuse Ahlus-Sunnah by smashing (combining) together two separate issues and forcing you to give a (singular) ruling on it as if it is one issue. And then they'll use whichever issue fits their desires to use against you to say that you have spoken with falsehood..."
[Then Abul-'Abbaas recited the first ayah of Soorat an-Nasr and asked if what he just did (reciting the ayah) is created or not. Then he explained:]
"Here's the point. You can't give one answer because I have smashed (combined) two issues into one issue. Alright? What are the two issues?
[One] The Qur`an is the Speech of Allaah - and it's not created, and
[Two] my actions.
When I read it there [and then asked that ambiguous question], I made the issue ambiguous; I put two issues together, and I wanted you to make one ruling, while they're in actuality two separate issues that require two separate rulings. And this is very important!
Not only regarding this specific issue regarding the Speech of Allaah, but this is one of the methodologies of Ahlul-Bid'ah in confusing the people! They want to combine two separate issues that have two different rulings - really fast and don't let you think about it. [They make you] combine them into one issue, and then [they ask:] What's the ruling on this issue?
And then once you've given your ruling on that one issue - instead of giving it tafseel, explaining it properly like you should if you are grounded in knowledge, and you know you cannot give just one answer to that question. If you give [this issue] its proper tafseel (explanation, detail), actually this issue my brother is two separate issues and you break it down as 'Abdul-Waahid [one of those attending the class who answered correctly] did. If that's the case, you're free of any blame. But if you give your verdict, your answer, now you have given Ahlul-Bid'ah the opportunity to...apply your verdict - which is correct in of the two - to the one that it is not correct to, and then ascribe deviance to you. So be careful about this methodology, and always think about the question you're being asked: is it one issue or is it two separate issues? If it's two separate issues with separate rulings, then I have to answer it with tafseel, and I can't give one answer..."
[One] The Qur`an is the Speech of Allaah - and it's not created, and
[Two] my actions.
When I read it there [and then asked that ambiguous question], I made the issue ambiguous; I put two issues together, and I wanted you to make one ruling, while they're in actuality two separate issues that require two separate rulings. And this is very important!
Not only regarding this specific issue regarding the Speech of Allaah, but this is one of the methodologies of Ahlul-Bid'ah in confusing the people! They want to combine two separate issues that have two different rulings - really fast and don't let you think about it. [They make you] combine them into one issue, and then [they ask:] What's the ruling on this issue?
And then once you've given your ruling on that one issue - instead of giving it tafseel, explaining it properly like you should if you are grounded in knowledge, and you know you cannot give just one answer to that question. If you give [this issue] its proper tafseel (explanation, detail), actually this issue my brother is two separate issues and you break it down as 'Abdul-Waahid [one of those attending the class who answered correctly] did. If that's the case, you're free of any blame. But if you give your verdict, your answer, now you have given Ahlul-Bid'ah the opportunity to...apply your verdict - which is correct in of the two - to the one that it is not correct to, and then ascribe deviance to you. So be careful about this methodology, and always think about the question you're being asked: is it one issue or is it two separate issues? If it's two separate issues with separate rulings, then I have to answer it with tafseel, and I can't give one answer..."
"[Imam Bukhaaree] (rahimahullaah) spoke with the statements of the Salaf who came before him. He said the Qur`an is the Speech of Allaah, and the actions of the servant are created. And he stopped."
Source: For more, click here -------> http://www.sunnah.tv/video/watch.cfm?v=lvpdhg
Source: For more, click here -------> http://www.sunnah.tv/video/watch.cfm?v=lvpdhg
No comments:
Post a Comment